Skip to content
Ecuador's endemic species are shown on a detailed map emphasizing the country's unique biodiversity.

Endemic Species of Ecuador

Ecuador’s country-endemic biota is documented through several taxonomic datasets rather than one compatible all-taxa inventory. The mainland Andes and Pacific slopes, the Amazonian side of the Andes, and the Galápagos Islands also produce different range patterns, so source-defined counts are kept separate instead of being added into a synthetic national total.

National and country-wide endemism measures
MeasureValue
Endemic vascular plant species5,700 species [S1]
Vascular plant species represented in the national guide18,500 species [S1]
Endemic share of vascular plants in that guide30.8% [S1]
Ecuador-endemic amphibian species326 species [S2]
Amphibian species in the 2026 dataset695 species [S2]
Endemic share of amphibians in that dataset46.9% [S2]
Study-defined microendemic amphibians151 species (21.7%) [S2]
Native mammal species484 species [S3]
Endemic mammal species74 species [S3]
Endemic share of native mammals15.3% [S3]
Endemic mammals extinct since 15003 species [S3]
Strict endemic bird species38 species [S4]
Bird species endemic as breeders only4 species [S4]
Recognized reptile species502 species [S5]

Data boundary. The plant, amphibian, mammal, bird, and reptile figures come from separate taxonomic treatments and should not be summed. The reptile figure is current national species richness, not an endemic-reptile total. The four bird species classed as endemic breeders disperse outside Ecuador after breeding and are therefore kept apart from the 38 strict country endemics. [S4] [S5]

Country, island and regional endemism are different range claims

An Ecuador-endemic species has its natural global range within Ecuador. A species restricted to the Galápagos Islands can therefore also be Ecuador-endemic because the archipelago is part of Ecuador. A Chocó endemic or Tumbesian endemic carries a different geographic claim: those biogeographic regions cross national borders.

Range labelGeographic meaningTreatment in a country checklist
Ecuador endemicNatural global range confined to EcuadorIncluded at species rank
Galápagos endemicNatural range confined to all or part of the Galápagos archipelagoAlso Ecuador-endemic if no native range occurs outside Ecuador
Chocó endemicRestricted to the Chocó biogeographic regionIncluded only when the species’ entire natural range also lies within Ecuador
Tumbesian endemicRestricted to the Tumbesian dry-forest regionIncluded only when the species does not naturally extend into Peru

A 2026 Ecuadorian nomination for the Andean Chocó illustrates the distinction directly. The two cloud-forest components contain at least 49 Chocó-endemic birds, while the same source separately records 19 national-endemic amphibians, 12 national-endemic reptiles, and at least 3 national-endemic mammals. Those labels are not interchangeable. [S6]

The Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena hotspot likewise crosses borders. Its dry forests extend through southwestern Ecuador into northern Peru, so a Tumbesian species cannot be treated as Ecuador-endemic without species-level range evidence. [S7]

Amphibian endemism is both large and range-restricted

A 2026 Scientific Reports dataset recognized 695 amphibian species reported from Ecuador, of which 326 were endemic to the country. The same analysis classified 151 species, or 21.7% of the dataset, as microendemic under its study definition; 69 of those were known only from their type locality and nearby areas. Another 79 names with Ecuadorian type localities had been synonymized and were excluded from the recognized-species dataset. [S2]

Type localities were concentrated unevenly across continental Ecuador. Among the 505 species whose type localities could be positioned with adequate precision, clusters occurred around Abra de Zamora and Loja, the Baños–Mera road, the old Quito–Santo Domingo road, and several Amazonian localities. Eastern and western montane forests contained more type localities than the dry habitats in the study’s ecosystem classification. [S2]

Microendemic is a study-defined range category here. It is not a taxonomic rank and should not be added to the 326 country-endemic species as a separate group; the categories overlap.

A source-defined coastal endemic set from Guayaquil

A 17-year inventory of Guayaquil recorded 63 amphibian and reptile species: 19 amphibians and 44 reptiles. Within that defined study area, six amphibians and three reptiles were explicitly marked as endemic to Ecuador. The nine species below are the complete endemic subset identified in the study, rather than a hand-picked example list. [S8]

Species-level endemic records shown: 9

Habitat entries reproduce the study’s occurrence categories for these endemic records.

Scientific nameGroupRecorded setting
Epipedobates machalillaAmphibianConservation areas; remnant native vegetation
Hyloxalus infraguttatusAmphibianConservation areas; remnant native vegetation
Trachycephalus quadrangulumAmphibianConservation areas; remnant native vegetation
Engystomops randiAmphibianConservation areas; remnant native vegetation
Barycholos pulcherAmphibianConservation areas; remnant native vegetation
Caecilia tenuissimaAmphibianConservation areas
Lepidoblepharis buchwaldiReptileConservation areas; remnant native vegetation
Dipsas georgejettiReptileConservation areas
Oxybelis transandinusReptileConservation areas; remnant native vegetation

Mammal endemism under the 2026.1 national list

The official mammal checklist version 2026.1 recognizes 484 native species and 74 Ecuador endemics. It also lists 43 undescribed or pending forms separately, 140 subspecies, 17 introduced species with wild populations, and three species extinct since 1500. The 74-species endemic list is therefore a species-rank subset rather than a count of every named or pending mammalian taxon. [S3]

The update changed the national treatment of several taxa. It added the newly described Oreoryzomys jumandi and Coendou sangay, recognized Oreoryzomys hesperus as valid, and treated Ateles fusciceps as a monotypic species endemic to Ecuador. [S3]

Endemics are concentrated in a few mammal orders

Rodents account for 53 of the 74 endemic mammals in the national list. All five recognized Paucituberculata species are endemic, while bats have the largest native species count but only seven country endemics. Percentages in the last column are calculated from the native and endemic counts in the same 2026.1 table. [S3]

OrderNative speciesEndemic speciesEndemic/native ratio
Didelphimorphia2600.0%
Paucituberculata55100.0%
Sirenia100.0%
Cingulata600.0%
Pilosa800.0%
Primates2214.5%
Rodentia1435337.1%
Lagomorpha4250.0%
Eulipotyphla5360.0%
Chiroptera18373.8%
Carnivora3725.4%
Perissodactyla200.0%
Artiodactyla4212.4%

Galápagos and the Andes separate richness from endemism

The national mammal dataset also assigns species to zoogeographic regions. These regional occurrence categories overlap, so they cannot be added to produce national totals. The derived endemic/native ratio shows a different pattern from raw richness: the Amazonian lowlands contain 220 native mammals but no country-endemic mammal in this regional treatment, whereas Galápagos contains 11 native mammals and nine Ecuador endemics. [S3]

Zoogeographic regionNative speciesEndemic speciesEndemic/native ratio
Galápagos11981.8%
Coastal lowlands187126.4%
Humid forest (northwest)152106.6%
Dry forest (southwest)13785.8%
Western subtropics (foothills)174169.2%
Western temperate zone941718.1%
High-Andean782329.5%
Western Andes601728.3%
Eastern Andes671826.9%
Inter-Andean valleys58915.5%
Eastern temperate zone902224.4%
Eastern subtropics (foothills)184137.1%
Amazonian lowlands22000.0%

Endemic mammals in the 2026.1 source-defined subset

The national checklist supplies a discrete 74-species endemic section. The three mammals that the same publication lists as extinct since 1500 are retained and marked rather than mixed silently with living records. [S3]

Species-level records shown: 74

Subspecies and the publication’s undescribed or pending forms are excluded from this species checklist.

Scientific nameOrder
Caenolestes caniventerPaucituberculata
Caenolestes condorensisPaucituberculata
Caenolestes convelatusPaucituberculata
Caenolestes fuliginosusPaucituberculata
Caenolestes sangayPaucituberculata
Ateles fuscicepsPrimates
Microsciurus simonsiRodentia
Simosciurus stramineusRodentia
Heteromys teleusRodentia
Reithrodontomys soederstroemiRodentia
Aegialomys galapagoensisRodentia
Chilomys carapaziRodentia
Chilomys georgeledeciiRodentia
Chilomys neisiRodentia
Chilomys percequilloiRodentia
Chilomys weksleriRodentia
Hylaeamys tateiRodentia
Ichthyomys orientalisRodentia
Ichthyomys pineiRodentia
Megaoryzomys curioi — extinct since 1500Rodentia
Mindomys hammondiRodentia
Mindomys kutukuRodentia
Neacomys auriventerRodentia
Nectomys saturatusRodentia
Neomicroxus latebricolaRodentia
Nephelomys moerexRodentia
Nesoryzomys darwini — extinct since 1500Rodentia
Nesoryzomys fernandinaeRodentia
Nesoryzomys indefessus — extinct since 1500Rodentia
Nesoryzomys narboroughiRodentia
Nesoryzomys swarthiRodentia
Neusticomys orcesiRodentia
Oreoryzomys balneatorRodentia
Oreoryzomys hesperusRodentia
Oreoryzomys jumandiRodentia
Pattonimus ecomingaRodentia
Pattonimus musseriRodentia
Phyllotis haggardiRodentia
Rhagomys septentrionalisRodentia
Rhipidomys albujaiRodentia
Sigmodon inopinatusRodentia
Tanyuromys thomasleeiRodentia
Thomasomys aureusRodentia
Thomasomys auricularisRodentia
Thomasomys burneoiRodentia
Thomasomys erroRodentia
Thomasomys fumeusRodentia
Thomasomys hudsoniRodentia
Thomasomys igorRodentia
Thomasomys otavaloRodentia
Thomasomys pardignasiRodentia
Thomasomys salazariRodentia
Thomasomys silvestrisRodentia
Thomasomys ucuchaRodentia
Thomasomys vulcaniRodentia
Coendou quichuaRodentia
Coendou sangayRodentia
Lagidium ahuacaenseRodentia
Cavia patzeltiRodentia
Sylvilagus daulensisLagomorpha
Sylvilagus surdasterLagomorpha
Cryptotis albujaiEulipotyphla
Cryptotis equatorisEulipotyphla
Cryptotis osgoodiEulipotyphla
Lonchophylla orcesiChiroptera
Micronycteris giovanniaeChiroptera
Micronycteris simmonsaeChiroptera
Sturnira boadaiChiroptera
Sturnira perlaChiroptera
Cabreramops aequatorianusChiroptera
Myotis moratelliiChiroptera
Arctocephalus galapagoensisCarnivora
Zalophus wollebaekiCarnivora
Mazama gualeaArtiodactyla

Bird endemism separates strict range endemics from breeding endemics

The Ecuadorian Ornithological Records Committee’s 2025 list follows AviList 2025 and recognizes 38 bird species whose known global distributions are confined to Ecuador. Its distribution field places 30 of those 38 in Galápagos and eight on the mainland. The same source keeps four endemic breeders in a separate category because they leave Ecuador during the non-breeding period. [S4]

Strict endemic bird checklist

Species-level records shown: 38

Distribution labels follow the source. Its notes flag species-level validity as controversial for Butorides sundevalli and Amazona lilacina, and state that Pyrocephalus nanus includes dubius, which may warrant species status.

Scientific nameEnglish nameSource distribution
Zenaida galapagoensisGalapagos DoveGalápagos
Laterallus spilonotaGalapagos CrakeGalápagos
Leucophaeus fuliginosusLava GullGalápagos
Nannopterum harrisiFlightless CormorantGalápagos
Butorides sundevalliLava HeronGalápagos
Eriocnemis nigrivestisBlack-breasted PufflegNorthern Andes
Oreotrochilus cyanolaemusBlue-throated HillstarSouthern Andes
Metallura baroniViolet-throated MetaltailSouthern Andes
Chaetocercus berlepschiEsmeraldas WoodstarSouthern Pacific
Buteo galapagoensisGalapagos HawkGalápagos
Amazona lilacinaLilacine AmazonCentral–southern Pacific
Pyrrhura orcesiEl Oro ParakeetSouthern Andes
Myiarchus magnirostrisGalapagos FlycatcherGalápagos
Pyrocephalus nanusDarwin's FlycatcherGalápagos
Scytalopus robbinsiEl Oro TapaculoSouthern Andes
Progne modestaGalapagos MartinGalápagos
Mimus parvulusGalapagos MockingbirdGalápagos
Mimus trifasciatusFloreana MockingbirdGalápagos — Floreana
Mimus macdonaldiEspañola MockingbirdGalápagos — Española
Mimus melanotisSan Cristobal MockingbirdGalápagos — San Cristóbal
Atlapetes pallidicepsPale-headed BrushfinchSouthern Andes
Certhidea olivaceaGreen Warbler-FinchGalápagos
Certhidea fuscaGrey Warbler-FinchGalápagos
Platyspiza crassirostrisVegetarian FinchGalápagos
Camarhynchus pallidusWoodpecker FinchGalápagos
Camarhynchus psittaculaLarge Tree FinchGalápagos
Camarhynchus pauperMedium Tree FinchGalápagos — Floreana
Camarhynchus parvulusSmall Tree FinchGalápagos
Camarhynchus heliobatesMangrove FinchGalápagos — Isabela and Fernandina
Geospiza fuliginosaSmall Ground FinchGalápagos
Geospiza magnirostrisLarge Ground FinchGalápagos
Geospiza septentrionalisVampire Ground FinchGalápagos — Darwin and Wolf
Geospiza acutirostrisGenovesa Ground FinchGalápagos — Genovesa
Geospiza difficilisSharp-beaked Ground FinchNorthern Galápagos
Geospiza scandensCommon Cactus FinchGalápagos
Geospiza fortisMedium Ground FinchGalápagos
Geospiza conirostrisEspañola Cactus FinchGalápagos — Española
Geospiza propinquaGenovesa Cactus FinchGalápagos — Genovesa

Breeding endemics are a separate category

These four species reproduce only in Ecuador under the CERO treatment but disperse to other countries or territories afterward. They are therefore not included in the 38-species strict endemic checklist. [S4]

Scientific nameEnglish namePost-breeding dispersal
Spheniscus mendiculusGalapagos PenguinEastern Pacific
Phoebastria irrorataWaved AlbatrossEastern Pacific
Puffinus subalarisGalapagos ShearwaterEastern Pacific and Central America
Pterodroma phaeopygiaGalapagos PetrelEastern Pacific and Central America

Vascular plants form the largest quantified national endemic dataset

Ecuador’s national biodiversity portal presents an interactive vascular-plant guide containing 18,500 species, including 5,700 endemic species across the country’s four regions. Within that guide, the endemic count is about 30.8% of the represented vascular-plant species. [S1]

The plant figure remains separate from vertebrate totals because its taxonomic coverage and source treatment differ.

Reptile richness has a current taxonomy but no synchronized endemic total on the public index

The second edition of Reptiles of Ecuador recognizes 502 species: 3 worm lizards, 5 crocodilians, 216 lizards, 244 snakes, and 34 turtles and tortoises. The 2026 edition reports 15 additions and two synonymies, and its PDF edition 2.1 was updated on 11 September 2026. [S5]

The public index supplies a current national richness denominator but does not present a synchronized country-endemic reptile total beside it. An older endemic count should therefore not be divided by 502 to create a current percentage. The Guayaquil dataset above provides a smaller, explicitly defined source-level set of three Ecuador-endemic reptiles without implying that it is the national total.

DNA barcode uniqueness is not an endemic-species count

Standardized arthropod sampling in Mashpi–Tayra recorded 8,057 Barcode Index Numbers (BINs), about 7,848 of them unique in a comparison of ten Neotropical sites. The source describes BINs as genetic clusters or putative undescribed species. They are not equivalent to 7,848 formally described Ecuador-endemic species and are not added to the national endemic totals. [S6]

What counts as an Ecuador-endemic species

The IUCN country-statistics system defines an endemic species as one occurring naturally within one country only, and its country-endemic tables are limited to species groups with more than 80% assessment coverage. [S9]

  • Natural range controls the classification. Introduced, naturalized, cultivated, captive, or conservation-translocated occurrences do not expand a species’ original native range.
  • Galápagos can be nested within Ecuador. A species naturally restricted to one Galápagos island is also Ecuador-endemic when it has no native population outside Ecuador.
  • Regional endemism is tested separately. Chocó and Tumbesian endemics enter an Ecuador country checklist only when their natural global ranges stop at Ecuador’s borders.
  • Species rank stays separate from lower ranks. Endemic subspecies and plant varieties are useful records but do not increase a species-level endemic count.
  • Synonyms are not extra species. Current accepted treatments prevent the same lineage from being counted twice under old and new names.
  • Occurrence gaps are not proof of endemism. A map showing records only inside Ecuador is insufficient without a distribution source that supports the native-range restriction.
Sources

[S2] ↩ Scientific Reports — Patterns in the distribution of Ecuadorian amphibian type localities. 2026 country-level amphibian dataset and microendemism analysis.

[S5] ↩ Reptiles of Ecuador — Reptiles of Ecuador, second edition. 2026 national reptile taxonomy and species richness.

[S6] ↩ UNESCO World Heritage Centre — The Andean Chocó Cloud Forest – Soundscape. 2026 site-level national-endemic, Chocó-endemic, and arthropod BIN figures.

[S7] ↩ Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund — Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena – Species. Geographic context for the transboundary hotspot and its southwestern Ecuador–northern Peru dry forests.

[S8] ↩ Ecology and Evolution — Urban–Wild Interface Diversity: A Comprehensive Checklist of Herpetofauna of Guayaquil, Ecuador. 2026 study and its source-defined Ecuador-endemic amphibian and reptile subset.

[S9] ↩ IUCN Red List of Threatened Species — Summary Statistics. Country-endemic definition and Table 8 assessment-coverage rule.